Archive for the ‘Reading Comprehension’ Category

Strengthening Your “Strengthen” Muscles In GMAT Reading Comprehension

Monday, January 25th, 2010

muscle One common GMAT reasoning question is the kind that asks you to “strengthen” the argument.  The most common mistake that people make on these kinds of questions is failing to stay close enough to the text of the argument as written.  Let’s look at an example:

Company X has instituted an Employee Wellness Program that will provide employees with free access to smoking cessation programs, nutritional counseling, and personal training services at a local gym.  Similar programs at other companies have been shown to improve workplace attendance and performance, and reduce the employer’s costs for employee health insurance.  Thus, the Employee Wellness Program will be good for both the employees and the company.

If true, which of the following would best support the conclusion of the argument above?

a) Many employees take advantage of free nutritional counseling when it is offered by employers.

b) Smoking cessation programs are only effective for 20% of those smokers who use them.

c) Personal training services at a local gym will make it easier for employees to improve their cardiovascular health and reduce the incidence of serious illness.

d) Exercising without personal training services can often lead to injury due to incorrect use of weight-training equipment.

e) Company X will give employees taking part in the smoking cessation program one paid hour off each Friday afternoon to participate in a support group.

Your first step here is to read the question itself, and notice that it’s asking you to find the answer choice that supports, or strengthens, the conclusion.  Then, as you read the argument, notice the word thus, which is a great clue to guide you to the argument’s conclusion, which is that “the Employee Wellness Program will be good for both the employees and the company.”  The argument’s evidence provides several examples of how to program is good for the company—it will “improve workplace attendance and performance, and reduce the employer’s costs for employee health insurance.”  But the conclusion talks about benefits for employees as well as the company, and the argument doesn’t state explicitly how the program will benefit them.  Now, let’s look at the answer choices one at a time.

a) Many employees take advantage of free nutritional counseling when it is offered by employers.

The counseling’s popularity might indicate that it is beneficial to the employees, but it might not.  This choice doesn’t clearly demonstrate that the Employee Wellness Program benefits the employees, and is a good example of a wrong answer that makes the test-taker work too hard in order to justify choosing it.  Here, one would have to assume that employees take advantage of the program because it is beneficial to them.  A strengthener shouldn’t require a major assumption, and therefore this choice is not the best answer.  Wrong answers like this are common, so watch out for them.

b) Smoking cessation programs are only effective for 20% of those smokers who use them.

This choice makes it LESS likely that the programs will benefit either the employees or the company.  This answer choice may catch your eye if you didn’t read the question closely enough, and are mistakenly looking for a weakener instead of a strengthener.

c) Personal training services at a local gym will make it easier for employees to improve their cardiovascular health and reduce the incidence of serious illness.

This is the correct answer.  The argument seems to imply that the increased attendance and performance and reduced health insurance costs are due to improved employee health, which would naturally benefit the employees.  This choice makes that unstated implication clear, and fills the gap in the argument.

If words like unstated and gap remind you of assumption questions, that’s a good thing!  Often, the weakness in an argument is due to the gap left by an unstated assumption, and the best way to strengthen the argument is by explicitly stating the assumption.

d) Exercising without personal training services can often lead to injury due to incorrect use of weight-training equipment.

This answer might be tempting, but again, it requires too many assumptions to tie it into the argument as a strengthener.  In order for this to strengthen the argument, one must assume that employees would still exercise without the personal training services, and that they would incorrectly use the weight-training equipment. That’s too much work for the question, and so this answer choice must be rejected.

e) Company X will give employees taking part in the smoking cessation program one paid hour off each Friday afternoon to participate in a support group.

This might benefit the employees, but it would be a burden to Company X. 

Therefore, it’s not the best choice. Lesson of the day: one key to success with strengthen questions on theGMAT is to remember that the correct answer shouldn’t take too much work to justify.

Reading on a GMAT CAT, without it being a CATastrophe

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

The GMAT is a CAT, or a Computer-Adaptive Test.  But on some sections, the computer is less an assistance than a hindrance.  The older you are, the more likely it is that you spent your childhood, teen years, and even adulthood learning how to read in a paper-based world.  Standardized testing, especially reading comprehension, is very different on a paper-based test than it is on a CAT.  Years of paper-based reading trains the test-taker to take notes on the passage itself, underlining significant sections of the passage and putting notes in the margins near the relevant text.  On a CAT, you don’t have that luxury.  But learning to read actively even without the benefit of marking up the text is key to improving your reading comp score.  Here are a few ways to do that.

Outline the passage paragraph by paragraph as you read

You will have scratch paper, and you should take advantage of it.  Jotting even just a few words to summarize each paragraph can help you get a handle on the passage and sharpen your focus.  An example might look like this:

Para. 1—intro, historical background

Para. 2—traditional interpretation

Para. 3—problems with trad. interp., and new interp.

Para. 4—conclusion

Taking notes like this as you read forces you to synthesize the text and read more efficiently.  Get into the habit now; use a notebook to annotate practice passages, even if you’re practicing on paper.

Keep track of proper nouns, dates, and other key words and phrases

Often, a question will refer back to a specific detail without giving you a line reference, and hunting for that detail in the passage can cost you precious time.  Expedite the process by keeping track of the kinds of details that are common subjects of questions.  Examples of this would be references to individuals or groups of people, places, theories, ect.; dates or time periods, particularly if chronology is important to the passage’s meaning; and key ideas that are addressed in detail only in one part of the passage.  Since you can’t indicate those things by underlining them or putting a star or other mark in the margin nearby, instead write a couple of words with a line reference to tell you where to find what you’re looking for.

Go to CAMP

CAMP—or Central Point, Approach, Map, and Perspective—issues are commonly addressed in questions.  Central Point is the main idea of the passage; often this will be summarized in one sentence, and you can indicate that sentence in your notes with a line reference.  Approach is how the author is writing the passage: is it a recommendation, a historical account, a rebuttal of a different idea, or something else entirely?  There are lots of possibilities here, but remember that each detail in the passage will in some way serve the author’s primary motivation in writing the passage; nailing the author’s approach can help you answer questions that ask you about the purpose of a specific statement or the passage as a whole.  Map is that paragraph outline that we talked about in number 1 above.  And Perspective is a one-word summary of the author’s tone: is it positive, negative, neutral, or something else?  Boil the tone down to a single word, and you’ll be prepared if it is the subject of a question, which it often is.  By taking a few quick notes on the CAMP issues before you tackle the question, you’ll be able to focus on finding correct answers that align with your CAMP notes, instead of being tempted by distracting wrong answers.  A sample CAMP note set might look like this:

C: lines 4—7

A: Rebuttal of traditional theory

M:

Para.1—intro, historical background

Para. 2—traditional interpretation

Para. 3—problems with trad. interp., and new interp.

Para. 4—conclusion

P: Critical

Reading on a CAT can require some adaptation of your usual approach, but with practice, it’s absolutely a surmountable challenge.  Start early, be consistent with taking CAMP notes on scratch paper during your practice, and remember that active reading is the key to success on the GMAT!